Having just argued with a Sainsburys' check out beast about why I wouldn't be purchasing an over priced red nose I now realise that Comic Relief will be on the television all night. Unfunny, embarrassing, self-worshipping ego monstrosity that it is.
It’s back. Worse than ever. And it’s everywhere!
The fact is it has become some kind of annual psychotherapy camp for delebrities (D-list celebrities) asking for your hard earned cash again!
But in between the hilarity, of course, there are those oh-so-serious bits about "what your money is doing". What our money is doing, of course, is paying the licence fee to show this pathetic blackmailing, has-been-revitalising drivel.
For most of us, however much we might hate the delivery, a combination of guilt and sheer ongoing hype will make us grudgingly put our hands in our pockets eventually, as we always have done, back to Live Aid and way before.
And that brings up another issue. When I look around and even do some research on the Internet, I still see lots of the kind of things we have been paying to put a stop to for about the last 20 years now. And not only that, I have never seen one thing to suggest that the money is really being spent in the way we are told.
So where are all these kids that we have allegedly helped? In Africa? Although it is conveniently very far away I don't think for one minute that tiny bore hole in the ground costs 10 million a year to maintain! I see all this money being collected but have no idea where it is actually being spent, because it certainly isn't anywhere near me. If I could just see a bit more evidence of the good being done then perhaps I would not be so suspicious.
Now there's another thing that makes me feel a bit uneasy about this situation. The television and radio companies (BBC radio is the worst) charge you £1 if you send a text to them, with 70p of this money going to Comic Relief. Err… excuse me, so where is the other 30p going to?
Why should we be asked to give generously when there are companies out there using these events to make a hefty profit? Surely they can do it at a reduced rate for Comic Relief? Why can't a larger portion or even better all of the money go to the people who REALLY need it? Oh no, of course not because it's not the big companies that stick their hands in their pockets; that's a job for us - the "paying" public.
It was even suggested that some celebrities got paid to appear.
If the show was a turn off beforehand the news that star billing was going to a lying, cheating, war mongering, smug b*stard with a plastic smile was the final straw. As if he’s not in enough “bovver”, Prime Minister Tony Blair tangled with Catherine Tate’s comedy chav teenager Lauren in a sketch for Comic Relief.
Typical of Blair to distract the well meaning public from his current troubles and provide him with a little comic relief. It is not the first time he has used this tactic.
Sorry its not for me and I reserve the right to donate to whom I please and not have it rammed down my throat by a bunch of over paid hypocrites.
Chris Sabian,
Peak District View - 2007-03-17 02:39:32